Andersen-Andersen is a brand that focuses on sustainability in its supply chain and environmental policies. In terms of its environmental impact, the brand has been rated as “It’s a Start” on our “Planet” rating. This means that while it has taken some steps to reduce its environmental footprint, there is still room for improvement.
One positive aspect of Andersen-Andersen is that it uses lower-impact materials, including organic cotton. This is an important step in reducing the carbon emissions and wastewater associated with traditional cotton production. However, there is no evidence that the brand is taking meaningful action to reduce water use, which is a significant environmental concern.
In addition, Andersen-Andersen does not appear to be taking action to minimize its packaging, which is a driver of plastic waste. This is an area where brands can make a significant impact on reducing environmental harm. On a positive note, the brand does use low-waste cutting techniques to maximize fabric use, which helps to minimize fabric waste.
When it comes to workers’ rights, Andersen-Andersen has been rated as “It’s a Start” on our “People” rating. This means that while the brand has made some efforts to ensure fair treatment of workers, there is still room for improvement.
One positive aspect is that the brand’s final production stage happens in Italy, which is considered a medium risk country for labor abuse. This suggests that the brand is conscious of the risks associated with sourcing from countries with lower labor standards. Additionally, Andersen-Andersen traces most of its supply chain, which is an important step in ensuring transparency and accountability.
However, there is no evidence that Andersen-Andersen has a Code of Conduct in place to outline its expectations for ethical labor practices. Codes of Conduct are important tools for brands to clearly communicate their commitment to workers’ rights and hold themselves accountable.
Furthermore, there is no evidence to suggest that Andersen-Andersen ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain. This is a key factor in supporting fair and ethical labor practices. Improving workers’ rights is an ongoing process, and there is room for Andersen-Andersen to strengthen its efforts in this area.
When it comes to animal welfare, Andersen-Andersen has been rated as “Good” on our “Animals” rating. The brand states that it sources wool from non-mulesed sheep, which is a positive step in ensuring the humane treatment of animals.
Additionally, Andersen-Andersen does not appear to use any animal-derived materials such as leather, down, fur, angora, exotic animal skin, or exotic animal hair. This is a positive aspect of the brand’s commitment to animal welfare.
Based on all publicly available information that we have reviewed, we rate Andersen-Andersen as “Good” overall. While there are areas for improvement, such as reducing water use and ensuring workers are paid living wages, the brand has taken positive steps towards sustainability and animal welfare.