Our Rating: 3 Stars - It's a start

Price: $ $ $ $

Country of origin: Australia

Official brand website: Visit

Assessing Lusana’s Sustainability Performance

When evaluating the sustainability performance of a brand, it is crucial to consider a wide range of factors that impact the environment, people, and animals. Our “Planet” rating delves into the environmental policies of brands, focusing on aspects like carbon emissions, wastewater management, business models, and product circularity. In the case of Lusana, the brand has been rated as “Not Good Enough,” indicating areas for improvement in their sustainability practices.

Environmental Impact

  • Lusana makes use of some lower-impact materials, such as organic cotton, which is a positive step towards sustainability.
  • However, there is no evidence to suggest that the brand actively works to minimize textile waste in its supply chain, highlighting a potential area for improvement.
  • While Lusana does use low-impact dyes in some of its products, there is no clear indication that the brand is taking significant steps to reduce water usage in its operations.

Workers’ Rights and Ethical Practices

  • Our “People” rating focuses on workers’ rights and ethical practices within a brand’s supply chain.
  • Lusana has been rated as “It’s a Start” in this category, suggesting some positive practices alongside areas for growth.
  • The brand’s Code of Conduct aligns with the ILO Four Fundamental Freedoms principles, demonstrating a commitment to upholding workers’ rights.
  • While Lusana traces most of its supply chain and conducts regular supplier visits, there is no clear evidence to show that the brand ensures all workers are paid living wages.

Animal Welfare Considerations

  • Our “Animals” rating examines brands’ animal welfare policies and how well they trace animal-derived products.
  • Lusana has received an “It’s a Start” rating in this category, indicating room for improvement in its approach to animal welfare.
  • There is a lack of evidence to suggest that Lusana has a robust animal welfare policy in place.
  • While the brand appears to use materials like leather and pearl, it does not seem to utilize wool, down, fur, angora, exotic animal skin, or exotic animal hair.

Final Assessment

Based on the information available to us, Lusana has been rated as “It’s a Start” overall. While the brand shows some positive efforts in using lower-impact materials and upholding workers’ rights, there are clear areas for improvement, particularly in minimizing textile waste, reducing water usage, ensuring living wages for all workers, and establishing a robust animal welfare policy. Lusana has the potential to enhance its sustainability performance by addressing these key areas and further aligning its practices with environmental, social, and ethical standards.

Similar brands:

Sustainable Review is copyright material. All rights reserved.

Close Bitnami banner