Salomon, owned by Amer Sports, is a brand that focuses on outdoor sports and adventure gear. As a company, Salomon also values sustainability and strives to make a positive impact on the environment. In this article, we will assess Salomon’s sustainability efforts and ratings in various categories such as the environment, workers’ rights, and animal welfare.
Salomon’s Environmental Rating
When it comes to the environment, Salomon has been rated as “It’s a Start” by the Planet rating. This rating evaluates brands based on their environmental policies and practices throughout their supply chains. Salomon has taken some steps towards sustainability by using lower-impact materials, including recycled materials. They also use a medium proportion of bluesign certified fabrics, which ensures that the fabrics are produced in an environmentally-friendly manner.
On the downside, Salomon has not demonstrated any evidence of taking actions to protect biodiversity in its supply chain. Biodiversity is crucial for maintaining balanced ecosystems, and it is essential for brands to actively work towards protecting it. Additionally, although Salomon has set a science-based target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in both its direct operations and supply chain, there is no evidence to suggest that they are on track to achieve these goals.
Salomon’s Social Rating
The “People” rating evaluates brands’ policies and practices related to workers’ rights. Unfortunately, Salomon has been rated as “Not Good Enough” in this category. While some of its supply chain is certified by Social Accountability International – SA8000, including its final production stage, there is no evidence of support for diversity and inclusion in its supply chain.
It is essential for brands to provide financial security to their suppliers as it can directly affect workers’ conditions and wages. However, there is no evidence to suggest that Salomon ensures this financial security. Similarly, there is no evidence that Salomon guarantees living wages for workers in its supply chain.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Salomon did not disclose adequate policies or safeguards to protect workers in its supply chain from the virus. This highlights the importance of brands prioritizing the well-being and safety of their workers, especially during challenging times.
Salomon’s Animal Welfare Rating
The “Animals” rating focuses on brands’ animal welfare policies and their ability to trace animal-derived products. Unfortunately, Salomon has been rated as “Not Good Enough” in this category. While they have a formal policy aligned with the Five Freedoms of animal welfare, there are no clear implementation mechanisms in place.
Salomon appears to use leather and down in some of its products. The sourcing of these materials can have significant impacts on animal welfare. Although Salomon has a policy to source wool from non-mulesed sheep, they do not provide sufficient evidence to verify their claims. It is crucial for brands to be transparent and accountable for their animal welfare practices.
On a positive note, Salomon does not appear to use fur, angora, exotic animal skin, or exotic animal hair. However, there is no evidence to suggest that Salomon traces any animal-derived materials to the first production stage.
Based on the available information, Salomon has been rated as “It’s a Start” overall. While the brand has taken steps towards sustainability, especially in terms of the materials used, there is still room for improvement. Salomon needs to prioritize actions to protect biodiversity, ensure workers’ rights and living wages, and establish clear mechanisms for implementing animal welfare policies.
By continuing to make progress in these areas, Salomon can move closer to becoming a more sustainable and responsible brand.