The brand Ukiyo has been given an environment rating of ‘it’s a start’. This means that while the brand has taken some steps towards sustainability, there is still room for improvement. Ukiyo uses eco-friendly materials, including recycled materials, which is a positive step towards reducing its environmental impact. In addition, the brand manufactures its products locally, which helps to minimize its climate impact.
However, there is no evidence to suggest that Ukiyo has implemented water reduction initiatives. Water conservation is an important aspect of sustainable production, as the fashion industry is known for its high water usage. Without taking meaningful action to reduce water consumption, Ukiyo’s environmental rating is limited.
Furthermore, there is no evidence that Ukiyo has taken meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals in its production processes. Chemicals used in textile manufacturing can have a detrimental impact on both the environment and human health. By implementing safer alternatives and ensuring proper disposal of chemicals, brands can make significant progress in reducing their environmental impact.
In terms of labor practices, Ukiyo’s rating is ‘not good enough’. While the final stage of production is undertaken in Australia, a low-risk country for labor abuse, there is no evidence to suggest that Ukiyo has a Code of Conduct in place. A Code of Conduct outlines the brand’s commitment to fair labor practices and ensures that workers are treated ethically throughout the supply chain.
Additionally, there is no evidence to suggest that Ukiyo ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. A living wage is a fundamental aspect of fair labor practices, as it allows workers to meet their basic needs and live a decent life. Without ensuring fair wages for workers, Ukiyo’s labor rating is hindered.
Furthermore, there is no evidence that Ukiyo audits its suppliers. Supplier auditing is a crucial step in monitoring labor conditions and ensuring compliance with ethical standards. Without proper auditing procedures in place, it is difficult to ensure that all suppliers meet the necessary labor and environmental requirements.
Turning to Ukiyo’s animal rating, it is described as ‘it’s a start’. While the brand does not use leather, exotic animal hair, fur, down, angora, or exotic animal skin, there is no evidence to suggest that Ukiyo has an animal welfare policy. Animal welfare is an important aspect of sustainability, as the fashion industry can have a significant impact on animal welfare through the use of animal-based materials. Implementing an animal welfare policy can ensure that Ukiyo’s practices align with ethical standards in this regard.
In conclusion, Ukiyo is rated as ‘it’s a start’ based on our own research. While the brand has taken some steps towards sustainability, there is still work to be done in various areas. By focusing on water reduction initiatives, implementing a Code of Conduct, ensuring fair wages in the supply chain, auditing suppliers, and adopting an animal welfare policy, Ukiyo can make further progress towards becoming a more sustainable and ethical brand.