Sustainability in the world has become an increasingly important topic of discussion and action. As concerns about climate change and environmental degradation continue to grow, individuals and businesses are looking for ways to make a positive impact on the planet. One brand that is leading the charge in sustainable practices is SNAP.
SNAP’s Commitment to the Environment
SNAP has been rated as having a ‘great’ environment rating, and for good reason. The brand takes pride in using a high proportion of eco-friendly materials, including Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) cotton. This certification ensures that the cotton used in SNAP’s products is grown without the use of harmful pesticides or synthetic fertilizers.
But SNAP’s commitment to the environment extends beyond just its choice of materials. The brand also takes steps to reduce its climate impact by using renewable energy in its supply chain. This means that the energy used to produce SNAP’s products comes from sustainable sources, such as solar or wind power. By relying on renewable energy, SNAP is able to significantly reduce its carbon emissions and lessen its environmental footprint.
In addition to using eco-friendly materials and renewable energy, SNAP also prioritizes the use of materials that limit the amount of chemicals, water, and wastewater used in production. This helps to minimize the brand’s impact on water resources and reduces the pollution associated with traditional manufacturing processes.
Concerns about SNAP’s Labor Practices
While SNAP has made impressive strides in its environmental practices, there are some concerns about its labor rating. The brand’s labor rating is currently listed as ‘not good enough’ due to a lack of evidence of a Code of Conduct. A Code of Conduct is a set of guidelines that a company establishes to ensure that it is operating ethically and treating its workers fairly.
In addition to the lack of a Code of Conduct, there is also no evidence that SNAP ensures payment of a living wage in its supply chain. A living wage is the minimum income necessary for a worker to meet their basic needs, such as food, shelter, and healthcare. Without a guarantee of a living wage, workers may struggle to make ends meet and may be vulnerable to exploitation.
Another area of concern is the transparency of SNAP’s supply chain. While the brand does trace some of its supply chain, it does not provide information on how often it visits its suppliers. Regular supplier visits are important for ensuring that ethical labor practices are being upheld and that workers are being treated fairly.
SNAP’s Commitment to Animal Welfare
On the positive side, SNAP has received a ‘good’ animal rating. The brand does not use materials such as leather, down, fur, exotic animal skin, or exotic animal hair, which are often associated with animal cruelty and unethical practices. By opting for alternatives, SNAP avoids contributing to the suffering of animals in the fashion industry.
In addition, SNAP states that it sources its wool from non-mulesed sheep. Mulesing is a controversial practice in which strips of skin are cut from a sheep’s hindquarters to prevent flystrike, a condition caused by blowfly larvae infestation. By sourcing wool from non-mulesed sheep, SNAP ensures that its wool does not come from animals that have been subjected to this painful and unnecessary procedure.
Overall, SNAP has made significant strides in its commitment to sustainability. With a ‘great’ environment rating and a ‘good’ animal rating, the brand demonstrates a dedication to minimizing its environmental impact and promoting animal welfare. However, there are areas for improvement, particularly in labor practices. Establishing a Code of Conduct and ensuring the payment of a living wage in its supply chain would be important steps for SNAP to take in order to improve its labor rating. By continuing to prioritize ethical and sustainable practices, SNAP has the potential to be a leader in the fashion industry and inspire positive change.