PSYLO

Our Rating: 4 Stars - Good

Price: $ $ $ $

Country of origin: United Kingdom

Official brand website: Visit

PSYLO: A Sustainable Choice

At the heart of the sustainability movement lies the need for brands to take responsibility for their environmental impact, treatment of workers, and stance on animal welfare. It is in this context that we evaluate brands like PSYLO, and award them ratings based on their practices in these key areas.

Environmental Impact: “Good”

PSYLO has been rated “Good” in terms of their environmental impact. This rating takes into account the brand’s commitment to using lower-impact materials in their supply chains, such as Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS) certified organic cotton. By opting for these materials, PSYLO helps to reduce carbon emissions, water usage, and wastewater in their production processes. Additionally, the brand implements a waste-minimization strategy by reusing most of its textile offcuts, further contributing to a sustainable approach. PSYLO also stands out for their use of biodegradable packaging, demonstrating a holistic commitment to sustainability.

Worker’s Rights: “It’s a Start”

When it comes to the treatment of workers, PSYLO has been rated “It’s a Start”. The brand scores well in terms of tracing most of its supply chain and conducting regular visits to its suppliers. However, there is room for improvement as there is no evidence of a formal Code of Conduct in place. While PSYLO claims to ensure payment of a living wage in its manufacturing processes, a lack of a specific definition of what constitutes a living wage raises questions about the effectiveness of these measures. Moving forward, a more transparent and comprehensive approach to workers’ rights will be crucial for PSYLO to improve its rating in this area.

Animal Welfare: “It’s a Start”

PSYLO has received an “It’s a Start” rating in terms of animal welfare practices. While the brand does not use wool, down, fur, angora, exotic animal skin, or exotic animal hair in its products, there is no evidence of an animal welfare policy in place. Furthermore, the use of leather raises concerns about the brand’s stance on ethical sourcing of animal-derived materials. To enhance its rating in this category, PSYLO will need to develop and implement a clear animal welfare policy that ensures the humane treatment of animals throughout its supply chain.

Conclusion

Overall, based on the information available, we rate PSYLO as “Good” in terms of sustainability. While the brand demonstrates a commitment to using environmentally friendly materials and reducing waste, there are areas such as worker’s rights and animal welfare where improvements can be made. By continuing to prioritize sustainability across all aspects of its operations, PSYLO has the potential to further enhance its impact and become a leader in the sustainable fashion industry.

Similar brands:

Sustainable Review is copyright material. All rights reserved.

Close Bitnami banner
Bitnami